> > Could you set burnfree on by default or give a competent reason to turn > > off burnfree?
> If I recall correctly, the first generation of these techniques could > "cost" near 50 bits, later ones 14 bits, I'm not sure how many bits are > trashed by current implementations. > For this reason it's best to not use these link capabilities but write a > continuous stream. So you think it's better to produce a definite coaster, as opposed to a CD which will probably work? I don't. If you're concerned, you can always check afterwards whether burnfree was needed. Of course you get better CDs without burnfree being used, but that is a small problem when compared with buying blanks by price. According to Jörg, the feature is off by default to ensure continuity and compatibility with <whatever I've forgotten and don't care about>. In my opinion, not a competent reason. Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
