Hi, > > (The jump between 64 and 128 MB might be a bit coarse.) > > My standpoint is that if you get into situation when you consider more > than 64MB, it's likely that bottleneck is abnormal
Or the user is an aberrated personality like me who streams compressed archives on the fly. :)) > and it's more beneficial to seek other ways to work around it, Psycho medication is too expensive in these days. 1 GB of RAM lasts longer and has less side effects. Pun aside: with 4x DVD you are of course right. But with 16x DVD a 64 MB buffer gives you just three seconds of reserve. Computed back to the times of 2x CD-RW that would be a fifo of less than 1 MB. Whatever. The exponential progression matches nicely with Moore's Law. Speed doubles, memory doubles, why shouldn't the fifo double too ? So for now i revoke my concerns. This fifo is good as it is. Have a nice day :) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
