On Wed, 08 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I just don't want my name tainted with accidents that happen during > > integration because you don't have a recent Linux installation. The > > RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was enough of an effort, my first patch would've worked, > > too, hence the GPL. > > Well, mailing patch with notice that it is not okay to modify it is > strange behaviour, and if I was Joerg, I'd just drop that patch, too.
You have apparently missed that I offered to relicense the patch under MIT license (which is liberal, allows modifications and everything) after I'd confirmed the integration went OK; and I was just returning the buck of being forced to change interface identifications all over the map from "mustn't modify" sections. The first step would be to look at the patch nonetheless, because it conveys information that Jörg has not extracted from messages since the first time SG_IO in ide-cd cropped up. -- Matthias Andree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
