Hi, > This is correct behavior from FreeBSD!
I hope the FreeBSD cd9660 folks see it differently. :) About all other BSDs already seem to like it. What about Solaris ? > The "IEEE_1282" draft was withdrawn with RR-V1.10 It is not mentioned there, indeed. > Mkisofs implements RR-V1.12 RRIP 1.12 does not mention "RRIP_1991A" any more. >From ftp://ftp.ymi.com/pub/rockridge/rrip112.ps : " 4.3 Specification of the ER System Use Entry Values for RRIP [...] The content of the Extension Identifier field shall be "IEEE_P1282". [...] The recommended content of the Extension Descriptor is "THE IEEE P1282 [...] Note: Upon adoption as an IEEE standard, these lengths will each decrease by 1. " So we have "RRIP_1991A", "IEEE_P1282" and "IEEE_1282" as potential signature for Rock Ridge extensions. A rugged ISO 9660 / ECMA-119 reader should accept them all. (It should better not draw much conclusions from them, though.) ------------------------------------------------------ Some observations from mkisofs images: There is field RR. Not even RRIP-1.10 mentions it. One has to google for old RRIP-1.09 to learn that it was a quite useless optional flag array which announced what other fields are to be expected. The PX fields have length 44 as prescribed in RRIP-1.12 and not 36 as in RRIP-1.10. But then the signature should either be "IEEE_P1282" or "IEEE_1282" as prescribed in that document. (Thanks to my peers i dropped the idea to flatly change xorriso's signature to "RRIP_1991A". I am heavily testing with that slightly ill setting, though.) ------------------------------------------------------ Have a nice day :) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
