On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:36:02 +0100, [email protected] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
>> ie: compiling readcd dir fails with >> >> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/cdrtools-2.01.01/readcd' >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `misc.c', needed by >> `OBJ/i686-linux-cc/misc.d'. Stop. >Corect, the problem is a bug in gmake that causes gmake to ignore some >dependencies... >> ==== Solution >>... >> --- readcd/Makefile.orig 2008-12-26 21:11:15.000000000 +0100 >> +++ readcd/Makefile 2009-01-13 13:16:26.000000000 +0100 >> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ >> LIBS= -lscgcmd -lrscg -lscg $(LIB_VOLMGT) -ledc_ecc_dec -ledc_ecc >> -lcdrdef >> lt -ldeflt -lschily $(SCSILIB) $(LIB_SOCKET) >> XMK_FILE= Mreadcd.man >> >> -cd_misc.c scsi_scan.c scsi_cdr.c: >> +misc.c cd_misc.c scsi_scan.c scsi_cdr.c: >> @echo " ==> MAKING SYMLINKS in ." && sh ./MKLINKS >> $(ALLTARGETS): cd_misc.c scsi_scan.c scsi_cdr.c > >To you like me to tell that adding other dependencies will work around the >gmake problem? I don't understand the question. I'm just saying that by explicitly writing all the symlinks names in the Makefile MKLINKS rule the gmake problem disappears. I'm not an expert in makefiles to say if this is an acceptable solution that you may want to use if you want compatibility with gmake or if it has negative side-effects or is in any case superfluous for "non gnu" make so that you won't add it. Since I have a solution for this specific problem, whatever you choose is fine by me. -- [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
