Its due tonight at midnight. So post it or send it as soon as possible. --JP
On 10/24/2007 4:50 PM, lacyjp wrote: > [Summary: Post stuff on wiki soon. If you have intel that isn’t “self > disclosure” post that too.] > > > Once again, we’re looking forward to scouting the Shirley. > > Our goal is to upgrade the scouting at opencaselist.wikispaces.com as > much as possible. > > This collaborative goal will take effort on the part of each participant > in the tournament. > > In the end, I hope the collective work will pay off by helping everyone > debate better. > > To facilitate scouting during the tournament, we need a good deal of > pre-tournament information. That way, everyone scouting can focus on > upgrading what we've already got & gathering new information. > > You can submit your information two ways: > 1. Become a member of the wiki & post it (Easy, just label your stuff > “Pre-Shirley”) > Just go to http://opencaselist.wikispaces.com/ and click “join . . .” Be > sure to include information that identifies you as a debater/coach for a > school in your request to join. > 2. Email it to me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (This way may work, but it’s slow & > doesn’t get common cite requests out of your hair as quickly) > > Target deadline: Midnight, Tuesday, November 6. This will make the > information useful before the tournament. > > Expectations: > > Affirmative Disclosure-- > > The most recent plan text(s) you've read. > Complete 1ac outline(s) with full cites [Author, Source, Date,URL, > page #s, First & Last phrases.] > 2ac add-ons > 2ac answers to common negative positions (including off case args & > major case arguments) > > If your 1ac is not 'traditional', describe your affirmative in as > much detail as necessary to provide the opposition the equivalent of > the above. [Plus full cites for anything that can be cited -- like > music or movie clips.] > > Negative Disclosure-- > > Basic rule: Disclose the quantity & quality of information you'd want > from a team when you are affirmative. > Include at minimum the generic strategies you've deployed thus far, > with a complete outline & full citations as described above. > I say this every year: A good norm to strive for is MSU's > > Pre-Shirley disclosure from last year at > http://opencaselist.wikispaces.com/Michigan+State+Neg > > We don't expect you to disclose new arguments. Keeping ‘caselist-able’ > electronic versions of new arguments is a great idea. > > A representative of Wake Debate has been assigned to each team entered > in the tournament. They will be in contact with your opponents, your > judges and maybe even you to gather as much additional information as > possible. We appreciate all the help you can give us in that regard. > > Thanks! > --JP Lacy > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > eDebate mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/edebate > > > > _______________________________________________ CEDA-L mailing list [email protected] http://www.ndtceda.com/mailman/listinfo/ceda-l
