Pedro Alves wrote: > Peter Kümmel wrote: >> By the way, currently we use wcelibex for a port of Qt to wince >> so we are in the same position as you, or worse because we only >> support the ms tools: is it :) or :( ? > > I took a quick look at wcelibex, and it seems to be more or less of the > same scope as > libmingwex.a - which is linked in by default on mingw32ce, and is a > static lib.
Is libmingwex a complete libc? The aim of wcelibex is to just add these functions which the msvc libs for wince misses. > > I don't quite understand what you mean by being in the same position, > but if I have > to chose, it is a :) :) I mean, by the TT port of Qt to wince some of our (scusi) work is obsolete. > > I'm trying to cleanup my Qt4 port, which is currently 4.1 based. > Unfortunately > I've touched many files, which makes it non-trivial to merge into your > Scusi (4.2 based). Currently we've only touched the QtCore code, so it more a problem of porting from 4.1 to 4.2. > > Here is my diffstat: > 147 files changed, 9267 insertions(+), 1985 deletions(-) > > That's Core + Gui + Network + qt3support + svg + xml + some examples + some > demos + a port of minesweeper from qt embedded (qt2). Impressive, this looks very complete! Much more we've done in scusi. > > Too bad TT doesn't accept user contributions... It is really sad... I've > been holding > this port for what ??? almost two years latent on my drive, waiting to > have a > stable enough toolchain to release it. I'll upload it somewhere and > then work from > there. I should have released it much sooner, but there was always that > something > else waiting to be done. At least you've learned one thing: release early, release often, even when it is not perfect. ;) But you have the mingw support which is really something currently not supported by TT. > > (Let me know if you want to take a look at the patch in the meantime.) Yes, I'm very interested. Maybe it isn't that hard to upgrade to 4.2. And if you like to have the code in Scusi (the idea of the name was the pronouncing of 'qce') you could add your complete code into a branch. Then we could try to get out as fast as possible our 'technology preview'. Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
