Bock Jens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across your project when looking for an gcj (GNU java compiler) port
> for WinCE on ARM.
>
> As far as I can see, your binary distribution for Cygwin does not yet
> include the gcj (only C, C++ compilers). In the initial voxware distribution
> from 2003 the gcj has been included, but only for a Linux (Red Hat 8.0) host
> system.
>
> Are there any experiences on compiling gcc with java support in the cygwin
> environment?
>   

Building with either Cygwin or linux should make (almost) no difference 
as we're building a
cross-compiler.

> Are there any other ways to get the gcj running under WinCE?

Someone has to go try it - I never did.  Voxware was based on gcc-3.x, while
we are based on 4.1.  A lot has been changing in gcj land, but I don't
really keep track of it.  The implementations could be completely
different, or not.  I think in gcc trunk there is a complete gcj rewrite.

 From what I read on the gcc development lists, it takes a machine with
more than 512MB to build (link) gcj's runtime, which I don't have, but
that is on trunk, not sure with 4.1, which we are currently based on.

I guess with cegcc would be easier to make it work, since you can take a
look at what was done on the Voxware's toolchain.  Craig at the time had
some problems with generating dlls, which are fixed now, so he sticked
with a static libgcj.a (is that the lib's name?).  Best would be to have it
working with mingw32ce.  gcj works with MinGW, so porting it to mingw32ce
should be feasible.

Cheers,
Pedro Alves



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to