> I can (and I'm inclined to) make the DLLs available as a separate > download. There would be two advantages to this : you could benefit, and > it would get tested.
Why not put them in, by default, and let the people choose which one they want to use? If you really want to make a new binary release, let me also go back to the "cegcc patch level issue". As Pedro proposed, there could exist several "patch level" macros. One for the "gcc/g++" compiler itself, one for the "win32ce api" (that is the "headers" and the "libraries", if I understand it correctly), and so on. If you really intend to "separate" different parts of the CeGCC project, then please implement different macros for each "separate part" NOW. They will be equal to each other, NOW (and in the near future), but people will be aware of them and they will start to use "proper" patch levels in their code from now on. This way the "new source code" will be "backwards compatible" in the future. Best regards, Jacek. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
