On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 22:34 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Danny Backx wrote: > > Pedro, > > > > A while ago you got the arm-unknown naming scheme accepted. We have not > > implemented it yet though. > > > > What would be the best way to proceed with this ? Do you know if any of > > the GNU tools imported this into their sources ? > > > > I would guess not but your never know. > > > > If we proceed with implementing this, would the best step be to first > > upgrade our version of some GNU tool to the latest one, and then do the > > work to implement "arm-unknown" ? Or would this be independent of those > > versions ? > > > > It's independant. The work to do this is really pretty much > mechanic, and can be done in one go, no need to do it stepwise. > Its just a matter of going throught the various config* files > and replacing -wince- with -*-. Like this for example: > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00051.html
I'm working on it.
I've also loaded binutils-2.18. Not sure if it's a good idea to do two
changes simultaneously but we'll see :-)
I was expecting you to say "we should upgrade gdb". Shouldn't we ?
> Incidently I've just downloaded a clean svn checkout
> overnight on my kubuntu, and it's waiting for me to
> build it. If you want to, just go ahead [*], otherwise
> I can do it, no prob.
>
> [*] - In that case, please remember to use the
> correct vanilla autoconf* versions.
Where do I find which the right versions are ?
Danny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
