On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:54 -0700, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> this may be a stupid question, really, but I couldn't find anything
> about this online...
Not a stupid question at all.
> For the cegcc functionality, it seems that the header files define
> way more functions than are implemented in the libraries.
> There are no bugs or feature requests submitted for missing functions.
> Is there an ongoing effort to add all the functionality, or trim the header
> files?
The header files are, in large part, inherited from other projects such
as mingw and newlib. From their heritage, the include files bring
definitions of functions that exist in other versions of Windows.
When pointed to such issues, we correct our headers.
There's been such as message on the list a couple of days ago. I should
have treated it already but didn't have the time yet. Will do shortly.
If you have corrections/submissions of this kind, please send in a
patch !
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
