Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Hywel B. Richards wrote: > >> >> I'm still using cegcc instead of mingw32ce for the efficiency of the >> memory allocator in newlib for my application (and speed is critical >> to this application). > > in that case, as I compiled zlib and libjpeg without using a custom > allocator, and as i compiled them with mingw32ce, i guess that they > are sub optimal, right ? >
I guess that depends on the pattern of usage of new/malloc/free/delete/etc for zlib and libjpeg, of which I know little I'm afraid. It may be, for these libraries, that they don't malloc much anyway (??). Hywel. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
