On Monday 13 October 2008 01:26:33, Eric House wrote: > Ok. So if I'm writing an app that *could* be built using M$'s visual > tools, that's written to the Win32 APIs, mingw32ce is the way to go?
Yes. > ==> find . -name '*.def' | xargs grep FindWindowEx > ./src/w32api/lib/user32.def:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ./src/w32api/lib/user32.def:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is w32api stuff not CE? CE stuff is in w32api/libce. w32api/lib is for the other Windows. > I suspected FindWindowEx might not be > supported but googling didn't find any statement to that effect. > Usually you can find people asking for workalikes in that case. googling for "findwindowex windows ce" I get many hits of people mentioning no support. E.g.: http://ryanfarley.com/blog/archive/2004/03/23/465.aspx http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forumarchives/pocketpcdeveloper/feb2006/post25957530.asp ... -- Pedro Alves ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
