Hello Peter: Our arm-wince-pe toolchain, which people here used as the basis for "cegcc", has provided us with arm-wince-pe-gcj for many years. We are currently at gcc-3.3/gcj-3.3 with this toolchain, and we use the arm-wince-pe-gcj it provides to build large commercial applications written in Java, for Windows CE. We statically link libgcj.a to help reduce the overall size of our applications. So yes, it has been done and it works well.
Regards, craig vanderborgh voxware incorporated On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 15:25 +0100, Peter Noesgaard Andreasen wrote: > Dear Sir, > > I read your message regarding GCJ and CeGCC (gcc for Windows CE) on > this website > > http://osdir.com/ml/gnu.cegcc.devel/2007-04/msg00017.html > > I have been asked to find out if it is possible to port a large Java > application (Java SE not ME) to a pocketPC platform. Unfortunately > there is very little information on this combination on the web. So I > wonder if you had any success with your GCJ since this message was > posted 1½ years ago? > > all the best from Denmark > > sincerely > Peter Andreasen > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
