I don't see a problem with having a private version of libtool for a
while. After all, we do this with several tools.
Danny
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 08:54 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > Actually I think it's time to move to new versions of the tools. That
> > includes gcc itself. Vincent has done excellent work on getting a cegcc
> > to work based on gcc-4.3.2, we should pick that up.
> >
> > Opinions ?
>
> A remark, actually: I have reported some problems about libtool and
> mingw32ce / cegcc (like not adding -lm in .la files or detection of
> import library). They are in git, and not yet in a release. Indeed, for
> example, I had to modify libstdc++.la after I compiled myself the
> mingw32ce compiler. Could you use such libtool version ?
>
> Vincent Torri
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
