Now my turn to try to catch up Vincent's suggestion: Once the Cegcc committers (mainly Danny and Pedro) have done the steps Danny mentioned, and the patches have been accepted and applied by the gcc folks, at some point in time installing gcc will be the only necessary software to be able to produce executables for Wince platforms? (of course using the proper target values), right?
If so, I also would say YES, please Pablo On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Danny Backx <danny.ba...@scarlet.be> wrote: > Let's see if I understand you correctly. > > The right approach would be to : > - sync with gcc trunk now, > - get our stuff stable, > - provide all patches to the gcc folks asap > > Or do you suggest another approach ? > > My vote would be YES. > > Danny > > On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 09:10 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote: >> Hey, >> >> gcc is finally branched. Is it the time to add cegcc support directly in >> the main tree, now ? >> >> Vincent > > -- > Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Cegcc-devel mailing list > Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
