On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 08:23 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2010/07/11 10:11, Danny Backx <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I can give you and other interested parties write access to the cegcc
> > svn if you like.
>
> Hi Danny & Pavel,
>
> I also thought about updating cegcc, but decided against it because I
> found merging/rebasing with Subversion too cumbersome. Thought about
> doing it cleanly with git (import gcc svn with all its history, copy
> cegcc on top, rebase on latest gcc) - this way, we could easily
> extract separate patches from cegcc, and submit them to gcc.
I won't go into a discussion about which version management system to
use, I know too little of the differences between them. I doubt that
subversion, or even cvs, give you much less useful support here.
Basically, take a diff between 4.4.0 and (somewhere before my DLL
changes) and you should be up and running quickly.
> We are still waiting that Pedro Alves merge the cegcc changes
> upstream...
I'm not entirely sure that this will happen.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
