The src/gcc-4.4.0 tree contains stuff which I believe to work, except when you target WinCE > 6.1 and try to build e.g. C++ DLLs.
The toolset does still produce working results, in my experience, for WinCE 6.5 if you avoid such DLLs. And it works for C++ if WinCE <= 6.1. But this is from memory, I may have forgotten some aspects. Note that I can provide SVN write access on the cegcc project for those who want to do real work on it. Danny On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 06:11 +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello, > > Well, ok, should have read the list archive a bit more ;-). Pedro > Alves' cleanup: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.cegcc.devel/2839 > > I'd still ask for other parties' patchsets, as that one is year's old, > and for gcc only apparently. > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:55:23 +0200 > Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to ask people who worked on producing a cegcc > > patchset/porting cegcc to newer versions of binutils/gcc to share any > > results they have, no matter how incomplete or preliminary they are > > (I in particular cc: Pavel Pavlov who worked on this at the summer > > per his posts to the mailing list). Just seeing size of patches and > > curious peek inside can give info/motivation someone needs to > > continue the work. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com > > > -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel