Hello,

On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:15:23 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was added as a member to cegcc project, thanks Danny! Going to
> > start some clean up work, and first question I have is about
> > project docs. There appears to be 2 sets:
> >
> > 1. http://cegcc.sourceforge.net/documentation.html - This is what
> > linked by "Development" on cegcc.sf.net
> > 2. http://cegcc.sourceforge.net/docs/ - this is what I have in
> > completion db of my browser, possible from old time.
> >
> > Which one is current (should be linked from wiki)? Should the other
> > copy be removed?
> 
> Normally, the first link is what Danny did when re-writing the cegcc 
> website. Hence it should be more or less a copy of the second link.
> Just verify it is a copy :)

Yes, now I looked closer and see that they indeed have identical
content vs style. I also guess docs/index.html come directly from SVN,
so is the master copy, while documentation.html conversion to site's
style.

> 
> regards
> 
> Vincent Torri



-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                          mailto:pmis...@gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to