Hi.
As mentioned earlier on IRC, parameter blocks don't seem to behave as
they should. I wrote a little test case:
def pccommandinput_testmsg1(self,celEntity,args):
params = parblock({"string": "foo", "int": 23, "vector":
csVector3(1,2,3)})
print("parameter object : ", params)
print("parameterCount : ", params.GetParameterCount())
print("parameter ID index 0 : ",
params.GetParameterIDByIndex(0))
print("parameter value index 0 val 0: ", params.GetParameterValue(0))
print("parameter.keys() : ", params.keys())
print("params[\"string\"] : ", params["string"])
Its output is this:
('parameter object : ', <blcelc.celGenericParameterBlock;
proxy of <Swig Object of type 'celGenericParameterBlock *' at
0x7f1d258b8f88> >)
('parameterCount : ', 3)
('parameter ID index 0 : ', 232L)
('parameter value index 0 val 0: ', None)
('parameter.keys() : ', [232L, 233L, 234L])
('params["string"] : ', None)
What I'd expect would be something like:
('parameter ID index 0 : ', "string")
('parameter value index 0 val 0: ', "foo")
('parameter.keys() : ', ["string", "int", "vector")
('params["string"] : ', "foo")
Anything else I can help to shed some light on this?
Liebe Grüße,
Sebastian Hoffmann
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Cel-main mailing list
Cel-main@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cel-main
