On 04/24/2012 10:31 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 04/25/2012 07:33 AM, Rob Landley wrote: >> On 04/24/2012 02:35 PM, Ezequiel Garc�a wrote: >>>> Linux in under 2 megabytes of RAM, even when running from ROM, is not a >>>> realistic goal. For context: linux 0.0.1 was developed on a 4 megabyte >>>> system in 1991. Swap support was added in december of that year so it >>>> could run on a 2 megabyte system. >>>> >>> >>> After some research I came to the same conclusion. I guess I was on >>> drugs when I tought that, >>> since even a kernel compiled with almost nothing (not even BUG >>> support) weights ~1.5 MB. >> >> I do note that this is inexcusable. The kernel _DID_ once run in 2 >> megabytes of ram, and 4 should still be a realistic goal for a tiny >> linux project of the busybox/toybox plus uClibc userspace kind. >> (Admittedly the last 4 meg linux system I saw was a uClinux circa 2006 >> at CELF, I think it might have been Grant Likely demoing it? > > I have done plenty of 4MB uClinux systems over the years, from the > early 2000's onwards. And I have a habit of showing them off at > CELF events. It may have been me... > > Regards > Greg
Probably was. Query: is there any way to set up a nommu system with: A) stock vanilla upstream packages (kernel, uClibc, busybox) B) running under qemu I've had a todo item to add a nommu target to Aboriginal Linux but every time I do so I poke at making i386 nommu and it just doesn't seem to want to do that. (Can't imagine why...) Admittedly, last time I tried was sometime in the 2.6.3x's... Rob -- GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code. Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation. Pick one.
_______________________________________________ Celinux-dev mailing list Celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org https://lists.celinuxforum.org/mailman/listinfo/celinux-dev