On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:40:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 22:10 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > So... for a selected kernel version of a particular size, can we please > > have a comparison between the new LZO code and this LZ4 code, so that > > we can see whether it's worth updating the LZO code or replacing the > > LZO code with LZ4? > > How could it be questionable that it's worth updating the LZO code?
Please read the comments against the previous posting of these patches where I first stated this argument - and with agreement from those following the thread. The thread started on 26 Jan 2013. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Celinux-dev mailing list Celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org https://lists.celinuxforum.org/mailman/listinfo/celinux-dev