> I agree with all the topics mentioned. Personally I think we can gain much > by improving remote services and updating the documentation so that it is > easier to get started with Apache Celix. There is nice page for a hello > world example in Apache Celix, but a page how get a CMake build environment > working separated from Apache Celix is missing. >
Good point, I agree. Is it a good idea to have some sort of "building framework" which can be used? > > I also think is a good idea to get the naming and typedefs straight. For > example we now have: > typedef struct listener_hook *listener_hook_t; > and > typedef struct bundle * BUNDLE; Agree with this one as well, I prefer the lower_case_t version, and have been using that one for newer code as well. What do you think? -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis
