Hi 2012/11/26 liu hf <[email protected]>
> Now, I have compiled utils, framework, log_service modules successfuly. > so it not difficult. Great to hear, if you want, could you please attach some patches to [1], or if needed open a new entry? > except dlopen and dlsym. I will study apr_dso_xxx, > then thinking celix's dlopen and dlsym. > I've done the same yesterday, and apr_dso_xx can't be used. They simply don't support passing the options we need. This is also mentioned in the documentation of "apr_dso_load" itself on [1]: *Bug: <http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/0.9/bug.html#_bug000001>*We aught to provide an alternative to RTLD_GLOBAL, which is the only supported method of loading DSOs today. I have some testing code that uses ifdef win32 etc. This seems to work. If you have some time to wait, I can look into moving this code to TRUNK. Looking forward to the patches! [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CELIX-24 [2]: http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/0.9/group__apr__dso.html#gedc8609c2bb76e5c43f2df2281a9d8b6 Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis
