On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Pepijn Noltes <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Alexander Broekhuis > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Depends. If he is a commiter and was the only one working on it with > > the > > > > sole purpose to commit it to trunk when done you don't need a > donation. > > > The > > > > icla (and ccla, respectively) are enough in that case. > > > > > > > > > > Good point, I automatically assumed the work has been done for Thales.. > > > > > > > This work has been done in Thales time, but only by me and with the sole > > purpose to commit it to trunk. I was under the impression that indeed the > > icla and ccla will cover this. Just to be clear, this is still the case > if > > the work was done in Thales time? > > > Yes, assuming you have an icla and a ccla from Thales covering you on file > as well. At that point, we trust that you make sure you only contribute > what you are allowed to contribute (i.e., make sure Thales knows about it > and you get whatever internal sign off you need). > > regards, > > Karl > > Thanks for the clarification Karl. I committed the remote shell code under issue [1]. Any comments on the implementation are welcome. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CELIX-44 Greetings, Pepijn
