On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Alexander Broekhuis <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi, > > > I am not so sure on this one. Is there any specific reason and/or need > for > > > this support? I don't have a feeling this is used a lot in the OSGi > > world. > > > But I might be mistaken... > > > > > > > Well I know we (Thales) will eventually need this for security reasons > and > > I was thinking that this is small enough to be realistic to realize in > the > > time frame (mid June till mid/end September), maybe even too small ? > > > > I don't know how large it is. While I understand the Thales point of view, > we also should try to keep in touch with the Celix community... So I am not > sure what to do ;). > > I am inclined to say that this is fine if no one else objects... > Well signed jars is part of the OSGi spec, so that would IMO qualify it for a "nice to have". > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally see much more need for a EventAdmin and ConfigurationAdmin > > > implementation. Another interesting part might be Remote Services, and > > then > > > in combination with Java OSGi Remote Services. Ie, protocol > > implementation > > > and discovery. > > > > > > > Well, the EventAdmin would be very welcome, so I agree on that one. > > > > Seeing the time, perhaps an idea to do 2 things? > Yes, I agree. > > > > > > At the moment I am supervising two students, one is working on remote > > services and the other one on the ConfigurationAdmin. So I don't think we > > need a gsoc project for those subjects. > > > > I am now realizing that it a good idea to keep this mailing list up to > date > > with the development the students work. I will ask the students to > > introduce them self to this mailing list and once in a while post an > update > > of their progress. > > > > Would be great to hear what they are doing! At this moment the Celix list > and work is really quiet... If you need some sort of review on their work, > feel free to contact me off-list. > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Alexander Broekhuis >
