Hi,
> This is not obvious from the code and not visible in the name of the type. > > Is it an idea to use _pt if the typedef is actually a pointer? > > > > I don't have any objections to this, maybe someone else? In either case, > could you file a feature request for this? > I have no big issue with typedef ending with _pt, but i would prefer to loose the pointer in typedef and just end with _t. This is than inline with apr, > > > > > > Final question: is there any plan for a new release? This would be > helpful > > to start using Celix in a product. > > > > There is no date yet. But if Pepijn does have some time, I think we can try > to make a list of issues we want to fix for a next release. I'd love to see > a release where the coding style has been fixed, and where windows support > has been tested a bit more. > I agree we should make a list of issues and try to make a next release. I agreed with Alexander to discuss f2f after my holiday. We will post the result of this meeting on this mailling list. Greetings, Pepijn
