Hi, > > I would like to start working on the implementation tomorrow so I don't > know how much time you would need to look it up. Pepijn and I created the > attached header files to base the new implementation on. The handler will > be giving a server to a RS and a Connection to the connecting client. What > do you think about this way of implementing it? >
No problem, I already checked, and all I did was some work where the http handler is separated from the RSA. There aren't even any services defined etc. So feel free to continue. As far as I can tell the headers look fine. > > I think every service will get it's own TCP socket or transport server. I > think this is a better way to do it. If one socket gets blocked because it > is busy the other sockets still can handle data, unless of course the > interface is blocked. > I think we are talking about two different things. You are right that for TCP each endpoint needs an own socket, but I was talking about a service factory. Thinking about this a bit further I don't think this will work, because with a service factory, every time the service is retrieved (getService), the factory creates a new instance. We probably don't want this for every user of the service. A service with an API in which a new socket and service is created via an API is probably good enough. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis
