On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Alexander Broekhuis <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi, > > > 2013/6/19 Roddie Kieley <[email protected]> > > > Hi Alexander, thanks for the welcome. Not sure what happened with the > > patch, I double checked my sent mail and I had attached it. Either way > > I have since created "Celix-72: 'Header Files' sub folder not included > in > > all folders in generated Xcode project' and attached the patch there. > > > > As far as I know this list should accept attachments.. > I don't think it does. The way to get small stuff to an apache project is to attach it to a jira issue (mainly because there you mark it as a grant). regards, Karl > I have applied the patch, haven't tested it on windows yet, but this will > probably only make it better. Visual Studio also expects all header files > to be explicitly listed. > > > > > > I am indeed using Xcode, and it apparently uses the Clang C, C++, > > Obj-C, and Obj-C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler. Most of my > > usage has been C++/Obj-C++ but it looks like C/Obj-C is also > > no problem, which has been my experience with Celix thus far. > > > > I use Eclipse on OSX, so I already use Clang etc. It gives better/more > warnings then GCC does, but not all of them have yet been fixed ;). > How did you instrument CMake to make XCode project files? I'd like to test > it a bit, and possibly add some info to the Celix page. > > > > > > As such, the discussion surrounding a wrapped and/or native C++ > > implementation is of interest and I will review the attached > > links to get up to speed. Wrt Remote Services will keep my > > eye out for more information on the specific goals of the weekend > > and see if there's an area I can make a contribution to remotely. > > > > Good to hear, if you have any remarks/ideas/etc feel free to post them! > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Alexander Broekhuis > -- Karl Pauls [email protected] http://twitter.com/karlpauls http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
