Shane Blackett wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Regarding "Specification of important variables" > > While I think this is a useful step, maybe it would be just as easy and > more useful to have a naming mechanism for groups of variables. > This could allow you to have automatic filters generated for various > categories, include "Important" variables. > I don't actually need that for PCEnv (and the survey results so far don't indicate that it should be a high priority). It was in the first draft of the specification because mozCellML needed it, and I didn't remove anything already in the first draft when merging with Andre's draft.
Perhaps this could be removed from this specification, since it doesn't really fit in a "simulation metadata specification" anyway, and we probably don't want to be stuck with it forever. > I don't know how to write that in rdf but loosely say... > > variablesGroup groupName="Important" > variable a > variable b > variable c > /variablesGroup > > variablesGroup groupName="Reactants" > variable c > variable d > variable e > /variablesGroup > If we are going to do this, why not use the grouping facilities already provided by CellML? Best regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
