Hi Andrew, This is looking good and will be a very useful companion to the simulation specification in terms of model curation.
Just a couple of comments. I would like to be able to specify a graph that has two different y-axes - i.e., it is pretty common to draw a graph that has the gating kinetics (non-dimensional variables ranging from 0->1) or ionic concentrations and channel currents on the same graph (vs time). The current specification states that in this case all variables will be drawn on the same set of axes with a common scale which can be arbitrarily defined by the application. It would also be nice to define the axes independently of the variables. If, for example, you are using this specification to define a certain plot to draw to match a graph given in a paper (or preferably to be using this specification to define the graph used in a paper), then the ability to define a fixed range of x and y is required. The fixed range may be either a superset or subset of the full range of the given variables. Also, the use of <cs:simulation rdf:nodeID="..."/> to reference the simulation which defines the variables for use in a trace seems a bit wrong to me. Seems something more like the <cg:variable rdf:resource="..."/> would be more appropriate. Does the <cs:simulation> element in this instance meet requirements for such an element defined in the simulation metadata specification - or is such validation not required? Even if its valid, I just don't like it :-) Finally, just a quick question: can <cg:type rdf:resource="http://www.cellml.org/metadata/graphs/1.0#scatter"/> be replaced with <cg:type rdf:resource="cg:scatter"/> or something, or is the full URI required? Andre. Andrew Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > I have produced a draft specification for graph metadata (that is, > meta-data describing how to create graphs from CellML simulations. This > could be used, for example, to allow CellML software to reproduce the > graphs from a paper). > > The specification is available at > http://www.cellml.org/specifications/metadata/graphs/. Any comments on > this draft would be appreciated (please send comments to > [email protected]). > > Best regards, > Andrew Miller > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion -- David Nickerson, PhD Research Fellow Division of Bioengineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
