>From the meeting minutes << http://www.cellml.org/meeting_minutes/13.11.2006/>> we have:
"There was discussion about what should be on the CellML roadmap. Peter noted that Matt was also keen on seeing a roadmap get created. Alan thought that curation information should be a high priority on the roadmap, because many models are not well supported now. There was some discussion about how we could rank the items on the roadmap. There was discussion about what should be on the CellML roadmap. Peter noted that Matt was also keen on seeing a roadmap get created. Alan thought that curation information should be a high priority on the roadmap, because many models are not well supported now. There was some discussion about how we could rank the items on the roadmap." --- I've been meaning to write up what 'curation' means since it is relevant to the ontology work; so now is as good a time as any. What I want to know is what other people think are the priority items of curation. It's a pretty broad area. Some of the active areas are review and validation (I refer to Andre's post recently about this), biological model description, simulation metadata, model archeology/topology, relationships to other models (versions and variants). Some areas we have barely touched on: the workflow and relevant information for model collaboration - think of this as "Two modellers stop using email to develop a model together". Anyway, all I want are people's ideas on what curation information is to them - i.e. what are the properties they want to look for and why? cheers Matt _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
