David Nickerson wrote: > Just to note that the page for the website has been ready for a while > now, it is only the programme which is not finalised and can't be until > we know who can make it....and we are running out of time to promote the > event... > Thanks for the correction.
I have put an errata note after the relevant part of the minutes explaining this. > Also, my suggestion on use of graphing metadata in a separate file was > aimed more at the case when you have graphs spanning simulations from > multiple sources - ie, multiple models or simulation descriptions from > different sources. > PCEnv allows multiple models (simulations are tied to models, we don't have a way to represent the hierarchy of simulations yet either) for one graph panel, so what you described applies in the general case. Peter's suggestion was that we tab a large part of the UI interface, so that it is possible to switch between completely different views, so that would need to be a file which is a level above the models in terms of the UI topology presented to the user (so a top-level file makes sense here). > Finally, just wondering if we could get an update (to the > cellml-dissussion list?) on the work Tommy is doing with metadata and > the repository and how it ties in to the CellML API? > The CellML API doesn't have a metadata API, but I hope that Tommy's work can at least give us a structure for the API (unfortunately Tommy's work is in Python, to match with Zope, which isn't a very good match for the rest of the CellML API). Other than that, there is no relationship, because Tommy's work uses Python RDF APIs. Best regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
