> My BCP document is intended as a way to maintain as much of the model as > possible in CellML, but simply leave the rest of the model unspecified.
yep - and I completely agree with this goal. I think this is the important point and the rest of what we have been discussing is simply what should and shouldn't be in "external code" - which as you state in the BCP, as much as possible should be in the CellML. With the BCP I think you are adding a bit more clarity to the specification that briefly mentions the use of the csymbol element to reference external code. And more clarity is generally a good thing. David. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
