Addendum: The model in the repository describes the apex cells only.
James Lawson wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm just fishing for some comments on how to handle cases where there > are models which describe, for example, the properties of multiple cell > types. Bondarenko et al. 2004 is a good example of this: > > "In the Bondarenko et al. 2004 publication described here, the authors > develop a computer model of the mouse ventricular action potential (see > below). The model includes parameters for both the apex and the septum > regions of the heart (the apex parameters have been substituted into the > CellML version of the model described in ), and this helps to illustrate > how there are regional differences in myocyte repolarisation in the > mouse heart." > > Penny Noble has just sent me a zip file containing the latest versions > of all the models she has curated for COR. I'm currently in the process > of comparing these versions to the latest versions we have on the > repository. In some cases, she has provided several variants of the same > model which describe different cell types, as above. > > Firstly, are these true 'variants'? If so, then the matter is relatively > simple. Unfortunately, if one goes through the repository list, variants > simply come up as a duplication of the model listing, with no > information concerning what the variant represents. This is something I > imagine will be fixed in time, but is presently rather frustrating > considering the issue at hand. > > Does anyone have any comments on this? Should I simply put the files up > as different variants, with a note in the documentation? > > Thanks, > James Lawson > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
