>> Does anyone have any comments or proposals, formal or informal, >> concerning what information needs to be included in the model status >> documentation? The more consistent I can be now, the less I'll have to >> go back and redo in the future. > > I presume you are talking explicitly about the element <section > id="sec_status"> in the http://cellml.org/tmp-documentation namespace? > e.g.: > > <section id="sec_status"> > <title>Model Status</title> > <para> > This is the original unchecked version of the model > imported from the previous > CellML model repository, 24-Jan-2006. > </para> > </section> > > > I would keep this brief as is, but those verbose changes that you > mentioned that described what the reason was for the change - i.e. > what it was fixing should use cellml metadata, specifically:
yep - this is the way I'd recommend also. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
