> Just one comment here. That is, if you look at the level 2 curation > requirements, the only one that isn't satisfied by most of the models > I've given two stars is the unit checking. So what this means is that we > have a bunch of models which are much better curated than the level 1 > curated models, but there isn't any way to actually show that if we > aren't going to let them be level two. This is related to your point > about splitting up the curation levels, and there are many models which > would require actually reformulating the model completely to get units > consistency (which would probably require the author getting involved.) > > If we did move units consistency up to level three, I think it would > make things more straight forward.
Rather than moving units consistency up to level 3 it would probably be better to move what is currently level 3 up to 4 and make level 3 all about units consistency. > I think for the time being I'm going to take a left-wing approach and > spend more time fixing the models that are completely broken. which I think is the right thing to be doing, I just think we need to be careful that the status advertised for a given model matches the definition of that status. David. -- David Nickerson, PhD Research Fellow Division of Bioengineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
