sorry, I was more meaning what it means that you have "asked for" something and what we're supposed to do about it?
But, yes - inclusion_CellML_1.1.1 might be better, or maybe target_CellML_version_1.1.1? for_inclusion_in_CellML_1.1.1 ? Andrew Miller wrote: > David Nickerson wrote: >> What does this mean? >> > I guess that CellML_1.1.1 is a bad name for the flag. Flags are a > generic facility in Bugzilla which are requested and then granted or > denied. I intended for this to be used for proposals to be requested for > CellML 1.1.1 (i.e. suggested for a given version of CellML), and then > granted or denied based on community consensus. > > How about Inclusion_CellML_1.1.1 and Inclusion_CellML_1.2 instead? > > Best regards, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion -- David Nickerson, PhD Research Fellow Division of Bioengineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
