In response to this message I saw on synthetic biology and cellml, we are organizing a small workshop next april to discuss standards in synthetic biology, nothing to do with SBML or CellML though they may be used as examples. SBML is currently a suitable vehicle for synthetic biology and CellML is an expensive standard to support so I am not convinced of either as yet but I could be wrong.
Give me an email if you are interested in attending. The workshop will be located near Seattle. For those who have a concrete contribution there is likely to be travel support. regards Herbert Sauro -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of James Lawson Sent: Sun 10/28/2007 9:18 PM To: CellML Discussion List Cc: Subject: [cellml-discussion] cellml in synthetic biology Here's a really interesting project (IMO) that seems to be pretty keen on using Cellml. http://openwetware.org/wiki/Talk:Registry_of_Standard_Biological_Models http://openwetware.org/wiki/Registry_of_Standard_Biological_Models/Registry_organization Openwetware is a big MIT based initiative to create a forum for and standardise synthetic biology. Seems to me they need some info on CellML... and some support. The first link talks about SBML (Mike Hucka is quoted,) but also mentions that multiscale modelling will be essential, which isn't something that SBML could call its forte. We, however, can. So don't mind if I do... ;) James _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
