Is there a way we could use some kind of variable substitution for the term "CellML file"/"CellML document"?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cellml-discussion- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Miller > Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2007 9:14 a.m. > To: For those interested in contributing to the development of CellML. > Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] specification draft and docbook > > David Nickerson wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > I have just starting looking at using git and checking your current > > draft of the specification. I have made a few changes and attach the > > patch (generated with git diff -p > andre.patch). Not really sure the > > best way to do things in order to share changes - I guess if there > are > > going to be many its worth signing up at the same place hosting your > > draft? but then I'll probably not have to much time to devote to > this... > It did prove very easy to set up the repository, however. If it is too > hard I guess we need to try to arrange our own CellML-specific hosting. > > > > > Anyway, about the only significant change I made was to turn all the > > sect1 and sect2's into section's - while this is probably more a > > personal preference, it seems to be a widely used one. > I have now pushed that change to my branch > (643b9d1260e9a64f6a0a20f79d6c88665e1dcc7a in git). > > > Hardcoding section levels just seems a bad thing to be doing to me, > > especially when you're using XInclude to include multiple documents > > into a single document....although maybe you are trying to force > those > > sections to a specific depth regardless of where they are imported > into? > > > > And then a couple of other things I changed that we can maybe discuss > > more on cellml-discussion. You are using 'CellML File' as the base > > unit whereas I generally think of them as documents - especially in > > the context of generated data which may never exist in an actual file. > > Again, just my preference :) > I created a branch normative-andre to track what your current opinion > of > the specification should be (of course, things like 'Change File to > Document' won't keep up with new instances where 'CellML File' is > added). This was pushed to my public repository on the normative-andre > branch as "92b7b3a7515c7aae22f42b417296ad263fee9433". > > Best regards, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
