Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for Include_in_CellML_1.2: Tracker Item 332: Describe how we can create secondary specifications to narrow CellML https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332
------- Additional Comments from Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CellML 1.1 has the concept of a 'CellML subset' of MathML. However, this has several problems 1) Even with the CellML Subset, the actual way in which models of various types are interpreted is ambiguous. For example, the CellML subset doesn't describe exactly what types of equations can be represented. 2) The CellML Subset in CellML 1.1 is too narrow, and specific domains will likely want to continue to expand the way models are represented. This suggests we need more than one CellML Subset, and they should be separated from the main specification. To achieve this, we need to write the core specification in such a way as to delegate the exact mathematical expression to a secondary specification (of which there could be more than one, and we could add new ones as the need for new types of mathematical models arises). _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
