Hi Justin,

As I mentioned on the tracker item, it would be really good if you could 
put together a proposal (perhaps as a document under your cellml.org 
member page) which describes exactly what it is you are proposing here. 
Something along the lines of what Andrew presented when putting forward 
the proposed refactoring of the code generation service. I'm really not 
sure how a "RDF parsing service" on its own is going to help meet the 
goals you describe.

I am also wondering exactly what you mean by an intermediate conclusion?


Thanks,
Andre.


Justin Marsh wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> For those who may be interested, there has been some discussion amongst 
> those involved with the CellML API recently about a proposed addition of 
> an CellML API side RDF parsing service; this would, for example, allow 
> us to remove our dependency on patching Mozilla, allowing us to build 
> PCEnv from an unmodified build of the Mozilla framework. The discussion 
> has moved over to tracker item 358
> ( https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358 )
> 
> Other reasons for such an addition have been for use in any future 
> metadata service, the increasing use of rdf, and for use in annotating 
> systems of equations.
> 
> Reasons against such an addition have included the availability of 
> preexisting libraries, the possibility of scope creep, the possibility 
> of introducing changes or dependencies in the existing CellML API, the 
> broadness of the current proposal, and a possible conceptual uncleanness 
> or incorrectness.
> 
> I would appreciate any feedback, comments about, or refinements of this; 
> however, unless the discussion is still raging, we want to come to at 
> least an intermediate conclusion by Friday the 9th of May.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Justin Marsh
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion@cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

Reply via email to