To be honest I'm not really so impressed with WA yet, but that's
probably because I haven't learned to use it properly.
Can anyone explain/speculate to me how submitting to WA would help our
goals of a.) increasing uptake of CellML, b.) model distribution [this
one is obvious,] c.) model reuse, d.) model
mix/match/cut/paste/remix/mashup, e.) model reparameterisation, f.)
merging of data sets....?
Simulation and graphing is nice - I guess this fits partly under
distribution? Actually Abhishek, this suggest echoes that request by the
BestGRID project for CellML input... (see
http://www.cellml.org/meeting_minutes/abi-cellml-meeting-minutes-2009-05-20/)
but potentially more accessible.
Kind regards,
James
Alan Garny wrote:
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of
Abhishek Tiwari
By now you must have heard about computational engine Wolfram|Alpha,
if not you can try here http://www.wolframalpha.com/. I am curious if
anyone have thoughts about contributing cellml models to Wolfram|Alpha
engine, currently they are accepting contributed structured data,
models and algorithms
(http://www18.wolframalpha.com/participate/algorithms.html). Alpha
does lot of fantastic things, simulation and graphing is one of them.
That seems like an interesting idea, but hopefully this wouldn't mean giving
them CellML files as such, but rather them making use of the CellML
Repository?...
Alan
_______________________________________________
team mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/team
begin:vcard
fn:James Lawson
n:Lawson;James
org:Auckland Bioengineering Institute;CellML Model Repository Curator, CellML Team
adr:;;University of Auckland;;;;New Zealand
email;internet:[email protected]
title:James Lawson
url:http://www.cellml.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
