For what it is worth: - 7.2: it is CellML to COR-like code that is working, not the other way around; - 7.3: regarding the metadata, it should be easy to keep track of them, so that when we go from COR-like code to CellML they get 'reinserted'. This is the way COR works for instance. Also, even though metadata are not currently handled in the COR-like format, it doesn't mean that they couldn't. We could, for example, have a generic way of representing metadata, as well as a specific way of representing metadata that we know about, can recognise.
Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: cellml-discussion-boun...@cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion- > boun...@cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan > Sent: 19 June 2009 02:57 > To: cellml-discussion@cellml.org > Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting minutes 2009-06-17 > > I have put the minutes from Wednesday's meeting up at: > > http://www.cellml.org/meeting_minutes/abi-cellml-meeting-minutes-2009-06-17 > > Dougal > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > cellml-discussion@cellml.org > http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion