Otherwise:
- "Is the model encoded in a public, standardized, machine-readable
format?": are we just talking about CellML or also FieldML, SBML,
etc.? This
is not clear to me. I get the impression that you are talking about
any kind
of standard, which is fine but I would like to be able to know, at a
glance,
the format in which a model is encoded.
- "Are the date and time of creation and last modification
specified?": you
have included a comment asking whether "we want to make model history
obligatory?" Personally, I think we do. In fact, I was going to ask
for it
before I saw your comment.
These points were lifted from the MIRIAM standard :
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/miriam/main/mdb?section=standard
For the first point we could absolutely add exactly which standard the
model was encoded in. And regarding history, luckily for us PMR2 now
date and time stamps any commit to the repository so this doesnot have
to be entered manually.
- As a general rule, should the answer to any particular question be
negative, it would then be good to be able to click on the 'negative
flag'
and be directed to a page that contains some information on what the
'problem(s)' is/are.
Point taken.
- "NOTE: The above detailed set of curation flags will need to be
condensed
into 3 summary glyphs visable next to the model name on the exposure
listing.": personally, the 3 summary glyphs I would like to see is the
format in which the model is encoded, whether the encoding is valid,
and
whether the model reproduces published results.
Finally, there are a few typos in your Excel document... :)
Err yes - this was already pointed out to me ;) I need to be more
careful :)
Catherine
Alan
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
