On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Hildebrandt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good. I wasn't sure as to whether I understood what I was > > > > doing. I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to kids *at all* > > > > if I did it the way I suggested. > > > > > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > > > That was with test-gtk -- my favorite test case. > > > > I hacked up not-to-be a little (tho nothing fundamentally different than > what I recall of your efforts which I cannot find in my email), moved > cells-store out into its own source file (update your asd!), reran the cells > regression test and test-gtk -- everything works.
Hmmm -- I don't see the new source file anywhere. What's its name? Did you add it to CVS before you did the commit? Btw, I've updated the cells-gtk3 stuff every now and then -- did you update from CVS recently? I added a bunch of trcs to see what gets quiesced when. > Mind you there may not be a non-.kids owning test anywhere in there, or > even anything that verifies that the .kids are getting quiesced, but your > report above of "I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to kids *at > all*" does not say /how/ you saw that, so maybe there is still > non-propagation which is not being exposed by the test suite and still needs > to be cured. I'd like to provide test cases. Where would be a good place to put them? Then I'd seize the opportunity and merge in my with-assert-observers macrology somewhere :) That would also prove useful to check what gets not-to-be'd. Thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ cells-devel site list cells-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cells-devel
