Good Morning. >> In each article referring to Max RPM as a Bible, is just wrong except in the >> sense that one means 'something ancient'. I would point solely to: >> http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Rpm >> as a single point of content management, and leave it at that. that page >> describes some better external resources. I request that change.
I would also prefer to list internal resources first on the Rpm page. Best Regards Marcus _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
