Spike Turner wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
So not related to CentOS ...
and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream).
The docs look almost the same and the docs refer to
security = share. However 3.0.32 comes with a blank smb.conf
making it harder to get a secure server
up and running.
Same as above
These are the rpms on my CentOS box
samba-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm
samba-client-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm
samba-common-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm
samba-swat-3.0.28-0.el4.9.i386.rpm
they are the latest that CentOS rebuilt from upstream. As an
aside the RFE on the upstream provider refers to the version
shipped (and by extension by CentOS) not covering all bugs
and issues fixed in 3.0.29 to 3.0.32.
Spike,
Please read this to understand how upstream (and by extension CentOS)
handles security issues:
http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs