Grant McWilliams wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Daniel de Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Justin Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos?
When the upstream distribution provides it. I am not sure if it is on
their roadmap. Of course, you could also use Xen 3.2 from XenSource,
but that's not supported here.
Take care,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
I was at a recent Linux convention and it seemed very likely that Xen
is no longer Redhat's priority at all and would love to put KVM in
it's place. The Redhat rep was very adamant about KVMs superiority
over Xen and the amount of unnecessary work to integrate Xen into
their kernels. Some day when KVM will actually do what Xen does (and
do it reliably!) Xen may not be an easy option.
Grant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
So are you saying we should start looking at using KVM instead? I've
never seen it, nor used it, so how much different is it from XEN?
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other
technical stuff
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
