Hi Eric...

I'm using virtio drivers on my hosts... Both Xen and KVM.

What I see is the KVM has been easier to manage and maitain.

Also, KVM is more easier to implement, 'cause I don't need re-compile
the kernel...It's just do a modprobe and everything is well...

Thanks

2010/7/26 Eric Searcy <[email protected]>:
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
>
> [...]
>> What you thing about???
>
> As far as running 15 VMs, whether your hardware is suited to do that depends 
> on how many spindles worth of SAS drives you have (improves concurrency), how 
> busy your VMs are (IO and proc), how much the guests are swapping in case 
> you're not giving them enough memory.  And if you're not running virtio 
> drivers, you should!
>
> I don't have the numbers, but several months ago I tested a few different 
> Iometer meter workloads on Server 2003 R2 guests on PE1950 hardware against 
> equivalently-matched VMs on the 1.x version of a popular proprietary product 
> (dedicated memory instead of its default swap-mem-to-host-disk; also running 
> the guest extensions), Xen on CentOS 5.4 with a then-recent build of GPLPV 
> (meadowcourt.org/downloads) on the guests, and KVM (also CentOS 5.4) with 
> somebody's build of unsigned virtio Windows drivers (was on a /~public_html 
> from redhat.com I think).
>
> Results: Xen+GPLPV beat out KVM+virtio enough to be considered significant, 
> but their difference seemed small compared to the margin they beat the other 
> contender by.  The proprietary one also had massive CPU load on the guest 
> generated by running the test that the others didn't have.
>
> Obviously that's all very vague, but then again I'm sure somewhere I've 
> accepted a EULA that says I'm not allowed to share benchmarking results for 
> certain products :-).
>
> I'll be keeping Xen (and therefore CentOS 5.x) around to run Linux guests 
> blazingly fast on still-usedful hardware.  Everything else I'm (slowly) 
> migrating to KVM in the interest of tracking with upstream.  Xen's slight 
> performance edge on Windows will be missed.
>
> YMMV.
>
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>



-- 
Gilberto Nunes
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Reply via email to